TY - JOUR UR - http://lib.ugent.be/catalog/pug01:665360 ID - pug01:665360 LA - eng TI - Evaluating the inter-respondent (consumer vs staff) reliability and construct validity (SIS vs Vineland) of the Supports Intensity Scale on a Dutch sample PY - 2009 JO - (2009) JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH SN - 0964-2633 PB - 2009 AU - Claes, Claudia PP10 001983260481 AU - Van Hove, Geert CA06 PP10 801000488996 0000-0003-3266-0524 AU - van Loon, Jos AU - Vandevelde, Stijn PP10 001994246945 801001415146 0000-0001-9491-9509 AU - Schalock, Robert AB - Despite various reliability studies on the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS), to date there has not been an evaluation of the reliability of client vs. staff judgments. Such determination is important, given the increasing consumer-driven approach to services. Additionally, there has not been an evaluation of the instrument's construct validity on a non-English speaking sample. This is important as the SIS is currently translated into 13 languages.Data were collected in two different samples, using the Dutch translation of the SIS and the Vineland-Z.There was a significant correlation between ratings of staff and consumers on the SIS; however, the relationship between the mean scores of consumer and staff responses indicated significant differences in staff and consumer scores. All correlations between the Vineland-Z domains and the SIS subscales were significant and negative, ranging from -0.37 to -0.89.Analyses of the inter-respondent reliability suggest that one needs to consider the source of information regarding needed supports carefully. The significant negative correlations between SIS and Vineland-Z reflect that the SIS is measuring a different construct (needed support) than the Vineland-Z (adaptive behaviour). The results of the two studies provide additional support for the etic (universal) properties of the SIS, as both hypotheses were confirmed. In conclusion, SIS users are provided with a wealth of information that can be used for multiple purposes. ER -Download RIS file
| 00000nam^a2200301^i^4500 | |||
| 001 | 665360 | ||
| 005 | 20161219154334.0 | ||
| 008 | 090525s2009------------------------eng-- | ||
| 022 | a 0964-2633 | ||
| 024 | a 000264186300003 2 wos | ||
| 024 | a 1854/LU-665360 2 handle | ||
| 024 | a 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2008.01149.x 2 doi | ||
| 040 | a UGent | ||
| 245 | a Evaluating the inter-respondent (consumer vs staff) reliability and construct validity (SIS vs Vineland) of the Supports Intensity Scale on a Dutch sample | ||
| 260 | c 2009 | ||
| 520 | a Despite various reliability studies on the Supports Intensity Scale (SIS), to date there has not been an evaluation of the reliability of client vs. staff judgments. Such determination is important, given the increasing consumer-driven approach to services. Additionally, there has not been an evaluation of the instrument's construct validity on a non-English speaking sample. This is important as the SIS is currently translated into 13 languages.Data were collected in two different samples, using the Dutch translation of the SIS and the Vineland-Z.There was a significant correlation between ratings of staff and consumers on the SIS; however, the relationship between the mean scores of consumer and staff responses indicated significant differences in staff and consumer scores. All correlations between the Vineland-Z domains and the SIS subscales were significant and negative, ranging from -0.37 to -0.89.Analyses of the inter-respondent reliability suggest that one needs to consider the source of information regarding needed supports carefully. The significant negative correlations between SIS and Vineland-Z reflect that the SIS is measuring a different construct (needed support) than the Vineland-Z (adaptive behaviour). The results of the two studies provide additional support for the etic (universal) properties of the SIS, as both hypotheses were confirmed. In conclusion, SIS users are provided with a wealth of information that can be used for multiple purposes. | ||
| 598 | a A1 | ||
| 100 | a Claes, Claudia u PP10 0 001983260481 0 802000138260 | ||
| 700 | a Van Hove, Geert u CA06 u PP10 0 801000488996 0 0000-0003-3266-0524 | ||
| 700 | a van Loon, Jos u PP10 0 802000301443 | ||
| 700 | a Vandevelde, Stijn u PP10 0 001994246945 0 801001415146 0 0000-0001-9491-9509 | ||
| 700 | a Schalock, Robert u PP10 0 802000142809 | ||
| 650 | a Social Sciences | ||
| 653 | a MENTAL-RETARDATION | ||
| 653 | a INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY | ||
| 653 | a QUALITY-OF-LIFE | ||
| 653 | a Supports Intensity Scale | ||
| 653 | a methodology in research | ||
| 653 | a carers | ||
| 653 | a intellectual disability | ||
| 653 | a behavioural measurement methods | ||
| 653 | a ADAPTIVE-BEHAVIOR | ||
| 653 | a CHILDREN | ||
| 653 | a AUTISM | ||
| 653 | a SATISFACTION | ||
| 653 | a PEOPLE | ||
| 653 | a EMPLOYMENT | ||
| 773 | t JOURNAL OF INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY RESEARCH g J. Intell. Disabil. Res. 2009. 53 (4) p.329-338 q 53:4<329 | ||
| 856 | 3 Full Text u https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/665360/file/6818383 z [ugent] y Claes_2009_JIDR_53_4_329.pdf | ||
| 920 | a article | ||
| Z30 | 1 HOGENT | ||
| 922 | a NIETUGENT | ||
| Z30 | x PP 1 PP10 | ||
| 922 | a UGENT-PP | ||
All data below are available with an Open Data Commons Open Database License. You are free to copy, distribute and use the database; to produce works from the database; to modify, transform and build upon the database. As long as you attribute the data sets to the source, publish your adapted database with ODbL license, and keep the dataset open (don't use technical measures such as DRM to restrict access to the database).
The datasets are also available as weekly exports.
Published 2018 Universiteitsbibliotheek Gent Disclaimer