TY - GEN UR - http://lib.ugent.be/catalog/pug01:1942944 ID - pug01:1942944 LA - eng TI - Reverse mathematics & nonstandard analysis: towards a dispensability argument PY - 2011 PB - Tokyo AU - Sanders, Sam UGent 002000184759 801001831539 AU - Okada, Mitsuhiro editor AB - Reverse Mathematics is a program in the foundations of mathematics initiated by Harvey Friedman and developed extensively by Stephen Simpson. Its aim is to determine which minimal axioms prove theorems of ordinary mathematics. Nonstandard Analysis plays an important role in this program. We consider Reverse Mathematics where equality is replaced by the predicate 'approx', i.e. equality up to infinitesimals from Nonstandard Analysis. This context allows us to model mathematical practice in Physics particularly well. In this way, our mathematical results have implications for Ontology and the Philosophy of Science. In particular, we prove the dispensability argument, which states that the very nature of Mathematics in Physics implies that real numbers are not essential (i.e. dispensable) for Physics (cf. the Quine-Putnam indispensability argument). ER -Download RIS file
00000nam^a2200301^i^4500 | |||
001 | 1942944 | ||
005 | 20190108121957.0 | ||
008 | 111116s2011------------------------eng-- | ||
024 | a 1854/LU-1942944 2 handle | ||
040 | a UGent | ||
245 | a Reverse mathematics & nonstandard analysis: towards a dispensability argument | ||
260 | a Tokyo, Japan b Keio University Press c 2011 | ||
520 | a Reverse Mathematics is a program in the foundations of mathematics initiated by Harvey Friedman and developed extensively by Stephen Simpson. Its aim is to determine which minimal axioms prove theorems of ordinary mathematics. Nonstandard Analysis plays an important role in this program. We consider Reverse Mathematics where equality is replaced by the predicate 'approx', i.e. equality up to infinitesimals from Nonstandard Analysis. This context allows us to model mathematical practice in Physics particularly well. In this way, our mathematical results have implications for Ontology and the Philosophy of Science. In particular, we prove the dispensability argument, which states that the very nature of Mathematics in Physics implies that real numbers are not essential (i.e. dispensable) for Physics (cf. the Quine-Putnam indispensability argument). | ||
598 | a C1 | ||
700 | a Sanders, Sam u UGent 0 002000184759 0 801001831539 0 974184985982 9 F70ADA7A-F0ED-11E1-A9DE-61C894A0A6B4 | ||
700 | a Okada, Mitsuhiro e editor | ||
650 | a Philosophy and Religion | ||
653 | a Quine-Putnam indispensability argument | ||
653 | a Nonstandard Analysis | ||
653 | a Reverse Mathematics | ||
773 | t Ontology and Analytic Metaphysics Meeting g Keio University Publications. 2011. Keio University Press. q :< | ||
856 | 3 Full Text u https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1942944/file/1942946 z [open] y Proceedings_Sam_Sanders_ontology_and_RM.pdf | ||
920 | a confcontrib | ||
Z30 | x WE 1 WE01 | ||
922 | a UGENT-WE | ||
Z30 | x WE 1 WE01* | ||
922 | a UGENT-WE |
All data below are available with an Open Data Commons Open Database License. You are free to copy, distribute and use the database; to produce works from the database; to modify, transform and build upon the database. As long as you attribute the data sets to the source, publish your adapted database with ODbL license, and keep the dataset open (don't use technical measures such as DRM to restrict access to the database).
The datasets are also available as weekly exports.