TY - GEN UR - http://lib.ugent.be/catalog/pug01:1043481 ID - pug01:1043481 LA - eng TI - Acquiescence bias: exploring the applicability of ipsative scoring and acquiescence modeling PY - 2008 PB - Bremen AU - Groenvynck, Hans PS04 001997039131 AU - Fontaine, Johnny PP09 801001646229 0000-0002-5684-0178 AU - Fisher, Ronald AU - Deutsch, Franziska editor AU - Tadesse, Lidet editor AU - Schnelle, Natalie editor AU - Price, Jessica editor AU - Boehnke, Klaus editor AB - Acquiescence bias, defined as the tendency to agree with an item irrespective of the content is an important methodological issue in cross-cultural psychological research. The present study compared two methods to control for acquiescence bias, namely ipsatizing and modeling an acquiescence factor using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Simulated data sets are being used to compare raw data estimation methods, ipsative estimation methods and the acquiescence modeling method on how well they can reproduce the true theoretical correlations between underlying factors of an uncorrelated bidimensional model. Three conditions were manipulated: factor strength, acquiescence strength and factor intercorrelation. Depending on the specific model conditions, correlations and CFA using raw data and ipsative estimation methods show big under- or overestimations. The acquiescence modeling method reproduces the true theoretical correlations very well, irrespective of the specific conditions. Estimating relationships between constructs by means of acquiescence modeling in CFA is much more widely applicable than previously thought and is advised, even when unbalanced item sets are used to measure constructs. ER -Download RIS file
| 00000nam^a2200301^i^4500 | |||
| 001 | 1043481 | ||
| 005 | 20180813140503.0 | ||
| 008 | 100919s2008------------------------eng-- | ||
| 024 | a 1854/LU-1043481 2 handle | ||
| 040 | a UGent | ||
| 245 | a Acquiescence bias: exploring the applicability of ipsative scoring and acquiescence modeling | ||
| 260 | a Bremen, Germany b Jacobs University c 2008 | ||
| 520 | a Acquiescence bias, defined as the tendency to agree with an item irrespective of the content is an important methodological issue in cross-cultural psychological research. The present study compared two methods to control for acquiescence bias, namely ipsatizing and modeling an acquiescence factor using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Simulated data sets are being used to compare raw data estimation methods, ipsative estimation methods and the acquiescence modeling method on how well they can reproduce the true theoretical correlations between underlying factors of an uncorrelated bidimensional model. Three conditions were manipulated: factor strength, acquiescence strength and factor intercorrelation. Depending on the specific model conditions, correlations and CFA using raw data and ipsative estimation methods show big under- or overestimations. The acquiescence modeling method reproduces the true theoretical correlations very well, irrespective of the specific conditions. Estimating relationships between constructs by means of acquiescence modeling in CFA is much more widely applicable than previously thought and is advised, even when unbalanced item sets are used to measure constructs. | ||
| 598 | a C3 | ||
| 700 | a Groenvynck, Hans u PS04 0 001997039131 0 801001674319 9 F68E827C-F0ED-11E1-A9DE-61C894A0A6B4 | ||
| 700 | a Fontaine, Johnny u PP09 0 801001646229 0 0000-0002-5684-0178 9 F67A0928-F0ED-11E1-A9DE-61C894A0A6B4 | ||
| 700 | a Fisher, Ronald | ||
| 700 | a Deutsch, Franziska e editor | ||
| 700 | a Tadesse, Lidet e editor | ||
| 700 | a Schnelle, Natalie e editor | ||
| 700 | a Price, Jessica e editor | ||
| 700 | a Boehnke, Klaus e editor | ||
| 650 | a Social Sciences | ||
| 653 | a ipsatizing | ||
| 653 | a confirmatory factor analysis | ||
| 653 | a acquiescence bias | ||
| 773 | t 19th International Congress of the International Association for Cross-Cultural Psychology (IACCP - 2008) g Book of abstracts of the 19th international congress of the international association for cross-cultural psychology. 2008. Jacobs University. q :< | ||
| 856 | 3 Full Text u https://biblio.ugent.be/publication/1043481/file/1898556 z [open] y download.pdf | ||
| 920 | a confcontrib | ||
| Z30 | x PP 1 PP09 | ||
| 922 | a UGENT-PP | ||
All data below are available with an Open Data Commons Open Database License. You are free to copy, distribute and use the database; to produce works from the database; to modify, transform and build upon the database. As long as you attribute the data sets to the source, publish your adapted database with ODbL license, and keep the dataset open (don't use technical measures such as DRM to restrict access to the database).
The datasets are also available as weekly exports.
Published 2019 Universiteitsbibliotheek Gent Disclaimer